An analysis of the morality behind the act of euthanasia

The basic question, then, is whether God or suffering is going to set the agenda of one's life--and death. A few hospice leaders claim that their care is so perfect that there is absolutely no need for anyone to consider euthanasia.

Rachels also states, "One reason why so many people think that there is an important moral difference between active and passive euthanasia is that they think killing someone is morally worse than letting someone die" This is not an physical action taken by a doctor to ease a patient's suffering and agony.

Both are appropriate to different people with differing values. Doctor A intends pain relief and foresees death as consequence, whereas, Doctor B intends death to release bed.

Moreover, all euthanasia cases must be reported to regional euthanasia review committees which should inform prosecutors about noncompliance with euthanasia guideline.

In conclusion, he admits he does not have any positive arguments for making physician assisted suicide legal, but since the opposing arguments are not strong, that it should be legalized Dieterle The decision in Compassion in Dying v.

The ethics of euthanasia

Christian motivation has undergirded a significant portion of the modern hospice movement in Europe and North America. A Moral Case for Voluntary Euthanasia One central ethical contention in support of voluntary euthanasia is that respect for persons demands respect for their autonomous choices as long as those choices do not result in harm to others.

But is that not what it is.

REVIEW ARTICLE – Euthanasia: protecting ‘right to die’ by denying ‘right to live’

That in all cases of hopeless and painful illness, it should be the recognized duty of the medical attendant, whenever so desired by the patient, to administer chloroform or such other anaesthetic as may by-and-bye supersede chloroform — so as to destroy consciousness at once, and put the sufferer to a quick and painless death; all needful precautions being adopted to prevent any possible abuse of such duty; and means being taken to establish, beyond the possibility of doubt or question, that the remedy was applied at the express wish of the patient.

As with other decisions affecting matters of importance, competent adults are presumed to choose voluntarily unless the presence of defeating considerations can be established. They do not see their God as being so vengeful as refusing them the Kingdom of Heaven if they accelerated the end of their life to avoid prolonged, unbearable suffering.

Augustine and Aquinas are primarily responsible for the formulation of the current Christian position against suicide. I believe that passive euthanasia would show a lack of interest on the doctor's part.

The first ethical precepts must have been passed down by word of mouth from parents and elders, but as societies learned an analysis of the morality behind the act of euthanasia to use the written word, they began to set down their ethical beliefs Type or paste an analysis of the topic of the mars pathfinder and the martian sufrace a DOI name into the text box.

However, it is God's prerogative to determine when there is no purpose for a life to continue. In addition, several organizations have been formed with the express purpose of disseminating this philosophy and literature, as well as with the intention of encouraging individuals to assist their loved ones in this "self-deliverance.

But it is not the highest good--which is why he was willing to endure substantial suffering. While there is no clear scriptural prohibition against self-destruction, many interpret the commandment against killing Exodus If this is what underlies the objection it is surely too paternalistic to be acceptable.

Is that last period of love and companionship with family and friends worth hanging on for. Involuntary euthanasia is a compassionate act to end the life of a patient who is perceived to be suffering and could make a voluntary request, but has not done so.

Family members and insurance companies may rather not pay the expenses to take care of a terminally ill person and would rather they die.

This is far from simple hardship, it is unbearable suffering. Should we have pity on those suffering without the hope to survive and allow them the dignity to die peacefully. It might be thought that in such an eventuality different moral concerns will be introduced from those that arise in connection with competent refusals.

He uses data from studies in the Netherlands to support his arguments, even though one of his first statements is that the situation in is not entirely comparable to the United States.

First, several important background concepts in ethical theory were explained. These are all guidelines for allowing a euthanasia to take place.

A similar petition had been sent to the New York Legislature insigned by approximately 1, New York physicians. Involuntary euthanasia is one where the person dying has made to request or is unable to request hastened death such as through infanticide or capital punishment. However; the inconsistency here is that Kantians agree with retributivism.

I feel that the needs of the patient should be first and foremost, so therefore if they want to put an end to their suffering, they should be able to make that choice. Human rights and euthanasia euthanasia law in the ACT early in 5 raise ethical, moral, religious, philosophical, legal, constitutional and human rights issues.

The Morality and Legality of Physician Assisted Suicide

The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) has powers and duties under the. to act in nature’s place, at least not with the aim of ending the euthanasia, as well as behind requests for passive euthanasia, THE MORALITY OF EUTHANASIA. Page 31 03/12/ Little, M.

My morality behind euthanasia is that euthanasia should be the right to die for patients who are intensely ill. Euthanasia is natural in a way because in real life, there is a.

Facts and Ethics Behind Euthanasia

The ethics of euthanasia. Nargus Ebrahimi. Thursday, May 24th, Nargus Ebrahimi Second Year Medicine University of New South Wales. This Act was short-lived however, after the Federal Government overturned it in with the Euthanasia Laws Act.

Ethical Theories on Human Euthanasia/Mercy Killing

WORLD'S TAKE ON EUTHANASIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS. Download. We may say suicide should not be confused with the terminology „euthanasia‟. It is an act of mercy rather than act of murder provided it is legalized in the eyes of law.

While religious and morality do have an influence, euthanasia and assisted suicide can be seen in the. Euthanasia is the act of putting to death a person suffering from an incurable condition. Voluntary active euthanasia occurs when a medical provider or some other person administers a lethal dose of a drug to a patient upon the patient’s specific request.

An analysis of the morality behind the act of euthanasia
Rated 5/5 based on 33 review
The ethics of euthanasia | Australian Medical Student Journal